Greenland: Strategic, Sovereign, Stubborn — The Arctic’s Geopolitical Flashpoint

Khoshnaw Rahmani, Jadetimes

K. Rahmani is a Jadetimes news reporter covering politics.

---

Image Source: Ida Marie Odgaard

Introduction: A Territorially Charged Revelation

On August 27, 2025, Denmark’s Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen publicly summoned the U.S. chargé d’affaires after Denmark’s national broadcaster reported that at least three Americans with ties to former President Trump were conducting covert influence operations in Nuuk, Greenland’s capital. According to eight unnamed sources, these individuals compiled lists of Greenlanders for and against U.S. annexation, probed rifts between Denmark and Greenland, and cultivated contacts among politicians and business leaders—efforts Copenhagen deemed “unacceptable interference” in the Kingdom’s internal affairs1. Overnight, this semi-autonomous Arctic territory vaulted to the top of the global strategic agenda.

1. The U.S. Allegations: What Happened and Why It Matters

1.1 Covert Influence Operations Uncovered

Danish public broadcaster DR reported that three Trump-linked Americans visited Greenland earlier in 2025 to:

• Compile names of Greenlandic citizens sympathetic to U.S. annexation and those opposed.

• Gather sensitive historical grievances—forced contraception and child removals—to sow anti-Danish sentiment.

• Cultivate relationships with local officials, potentially laying groundwork for a secessionist movement.

DR cited government and security sources that believe these actions aimed to weaken ties within the Kingdom of Denmark, clearing a path for U.S. control.

1.2 Copenhagen’s Diplomatic Counterpunch

Foreign Minister Rasmussen summoned Mark Stroh, the U.S. chargé d’affaires, for a “productive conversation” and warned that Denmark would not tolerate meddling in its internal matters. Denmark’s Security and Intelligence Service (PET) confirmed Greenland is “a target for influence campaigns of various kinds,” including exploitation of real or fabricated disagreements to fracture the Kingdom’s unity1. The U.S. State Department declined to comment on private citizens’ actions but affirmed respect for Greenland’s right to self-determination and its alliance with Denmark.

1.3 Trump’s Arctic Obsession Revived

President Trump first publicly mused about purchasing Greenland in 2019, then revived the idea upon his 2024 return to the White House. In May 2025, he told NBC News he would not rule out using military force to secure the island, calling it “vital for international security” and “something we need very badly”. His statements unnerved NATO allies and crystallized fears of a return to territorial aggrandizement in an era of rising great-power competition.

2. Greenland’s Political Status: Autonomy with Strings Attached

Greenland’s constitutional framework balances self-rule with Danish oversight:

• Self-Government Act (2009): Grants Nuuk authority over most domestic affairs—education, health, fisheries—while Denmark retains foreign policy, defense, and monetary control.

• Path to Independence: Article 21 allows Greenlandic voters to hold a referendum, after which Greenland and Denmark negotiate the terms of separation; final approval rests with both the Alþingi (Greenland’s parliament) and the Danish Folketing.

• Economic Dependence: An annual Danish subsidy of roughly DKK 3 billion (€400 million) accounts for nearly half of Greenland’s public revenue, underscoring the financial ties that bind Nuuk to Copenhagen.

This hybrid model—home rule on paper, financial tether in practice—fuels debates over political sovereignty and long-term viability.

3. A Deep History: From Norse Sagas to Self-Governance

Year	Milestone
c. 985 CE	Norse settlers under Erik the Red establish Eastern settlements and Inuit-Norse contact begins.
13th–18th c.	Greenland comes under the Church of Norway; trading posts and missionary activity usher in Danish influence.
1721–1951	Denmark formalizes colonial rule; Cold War geopolitics spark U.S. occupation to thwart German advances.
1951	Defense and foreign affairs permanently vested in Denmark by treaty; construction of Thule Air Base begins (now Pituffik Space Base).
1979	Greenland attains limited home rule, gaining control over internal matters.
2008	Greenlanders vote in favor of expanded self-government in a non-binding referendum.
2009	Self-Government Act ratified, establishing constitutional path to independence.
2014–2015	Russia’s annexation of Crimea prompts renewed NATO focus on Greenland’s strategic role.
2018	First public debate on independence; polling indicates a majority favor eventual separation.
2025	Pro-independence coalition wins Inatsisartut election; U.S. influence allegations surface.

Greenland’s story is one of overlapping sovereignties, from Viking Age sagas and colonial outposts to Cold War defenses and contemporary self-rule.

4. A Multi-Dimensional Portrait

4.1 Demography & Society

Greenland is home to approximately 56,000 people, of whom roughly 88% are Indigenous Inuit, with Danish and other minorities represented in the towns along the west coast. Kalaallisut (Greenlandic) is the sole official language, though Danish and English are widely spoken in government, business, and academia. Youthful populations gravitate to Nuuk and Sisimiut, while smaller settlements face outmigration.

4.2 Economy & Resources

Fishing accounts for over 90% of Greenland’s exports, primarily shrimp and halibut. Melting ice is opening prospects for mining deposits—rare earth elements, uranium, gold—and hydrocarbon exploration, though environmental concerns and infrastructure gaps pose challenges. Tourism, focused on iceberg viewing and Inuit culture, grew pre-pandemic but remains highly seasonal.

4.3 Environment & Climate

Greenland loses an estimated 250 billion tonnes of ice annually, contributing to global sea-level rise and altering ecosystems. Thawing permafrost threatens traditional housing, while new Arctic shipping lanes increase traffic and pollution. Community-led research stations and Danish grants fund climate monitoring and adaptive infrastructure projects.

4.4 Indigenous Rights & Cultural Revival

A robust Inuit cultural renaissance celebrates drum dancing, throat singing, and kayaking techniques long suppressed under colonial rule. Greenland’s government has issued formal apologies for historical abuses—forced removals of Inuit children and non-consensual contraception campaigns—to heal wounds and preempt foreign exploitation of these grievances.

5. The Independence Movement: Momentum and Caution

5.1 Electoral Shift in 2025

In Inatsisartut elections held on March 11, 2025, pro-independence parties (Inuit Ataqatigiit, Naleraq, Democrats) secured a narrow majority, signaling public appetite for a sovereignty roadmap tied to economic resilience rather than abrupt separation.

5.2 Roadmap to Sovereignty

1. Coalition Mandate: Establish a working group on constitutional transition.

2. Referendum Planning: Draft legislation, secure funding, and set voter eligibility criteria.

3. Negotiations: Bilateral talks on debt, assets, defense, citizenship, and international obligations.

4. Implementation Phase: Ramp up government capacity, ratify treaties, and pursue global recognition.

Comparable cases underscore the complexities: Scotland’s 2014 referendum rejected independence amid economic uncertainties, while Quebec’s narrow defeats in 1980 and 1995 highlight the razor-thin margins in identity-driven votes.

6. Greenland on the Great-Power Chessboard

Power	Arctic Interests	Recent Actions
United States	Missile defense (Pituffik Space Base), rare earths, shipping lanes	Covert influence ops; annexation talk; military threats2
Russia	Northern Sea Route, energy exploration	Arctic military build-up; strategic bomber patrols
China	“Polar Silk Road,” mining concessions	Research stations; MOUs with mining firms
European Union	Climate governance, scientific research	EU-Greenland climate and education grants

As the Arctic warms and new sea routes emerge, Greenland’s ice-bound shores are the fulcrum of 21st-century power projection.

7. Comparative Flashpoints: Lessons from Abroad

• Falkland Islands (UK/Argentina): A 1982 conflict over remote territory underscored that even small islands can inflame national pride and trigger war.

• Crimea (Ukraine/Russia): Russia’s 2014 annexation via referendum—widely condemned—demonstrates how strategic pretexts can mask outright seizure.

 South China Sea (China/ASEAN): Land reclamation and artificial islands reveal how maritime turf wars can reshape regional balance without open combat.

Greenland’s fate may hinge on diplomatic vigilance: unilateral moves by any major power risk fracturing NATO solidarity.

8. Timeline of Greenland’s Strategic Evolution

Year	Event
c. 985 CE	Norse settlement, Inuit-Norse cultural exchanges begin.
1721	Hans Egede establishes first Danish mission.
1941	U.S. occupies Greenland to preempt Axis use in World War II.
1951	Defense and foreign policy ceded to Denmark under treaty.
1953	Construction of Thule/Air Base (Pituffik).
1979	Introduction of home rule; internal self-government starts.
2009	Self-Government Act ratified—constitutional path to independence.
2019	Trump’s first bid to buy Greenland rejected.
2024	Trump renews annexation talk upon reelection.
Mar 2025	Pro-independence parties win Inatsisartut majority.
Aug 2025	Alleged U.S. covert operations uncovered; U.S. envoy summoned.

Greenland’s Future on Its Own Terms

Greenland stands at a crossroads. Its vast mineral wealth, strategic location, and fragile ecosystems have drawn great-power attention once reserved for oil-rich deserts. Yet Greenlanders—through colonial scars and modern aspirations—insist on charting their own course. Annexation fantasies collide with a sober realization: true sovereignty demands not only territory, but economic self-reliance, cultural resilience, and international respect. In this new Arctic age, Greenland’s destiny will be shaped not by dalliance with superpowers, but by the steadfast resolve of its people—strategic, sovereign, and stubborn.