top of page

Hadisur Rahman, JadeTimes Staff

H. Rahman is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Asia

Image Source: Farhat Javed
Image Source: Farhat Javed

Tensions between India and Pakistan have escalated sharply following Indian air strikes on multiple locations in Pakistan-administered Kashmir early Wednesday morning. The strikes come in the aftermath of a deadly militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that claimed the lives of 26 civilians.


According to India's military, the air strikes were targeted operations aimed at dismantling infrastructure linked to Pakistan-based militant groups allegedly responsible for the recent attack. Delhi has accused Islamabad of providing tacit support to these groups an accusation that Pakistan has repeatedly denied.


In Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, residents were jolted awake by the sound of explosions. Mohammed Waheed, a local resident, described the scene as chaotic: “Before we could even process what was happening, more missiles struck, causing widespread panic. Children were crying, women were running around, trying to find safety.”

Waheed said four missiles hit an educational complex in the Nangal Sahadan suburb, destroying part of the Bilal Mosque and damaging nearby facilities including a school and a medical clinic. "We prayed at that mosque every day. There was never any suspicious activity,” he added.

Pakistani officials confirmed that eight civilians were killed and at least 35 others injured in the strikes. Among the damaged buildings were mosques and residential areas, raising serious concerns about civilian casualties.


India, meanwhile, reported that at least seven civilians were killed on its side of the Line of Control (LoC) due to retaliatory Pakistani shelling. In India’s Poonch district, Ruby Kaur, a local woman, was reportedly killed by a mortar shell while making tea for her ailing husband. “The shrapnel hit her head. We rushed her to the hospital, but she was declared dead,” her uncle, Buava Singh, told the BBC.

Local officials on both sides of the LoC have described widespread fear and displacement. “People couldn’t sleep the entire night. 


They were abandoning homes and looking for shelter,” said Dr. Zamrood Mughal, a resident of Poonch. India’s Ministry of Defence described the operation as “focused, measured, and non-escalatory,” emphasizing that only verified terrorist targets were hit. However, the presence of civilian casualties and damage to religious structures has prompted widespread criticism and concern from international observers and humanitarian organizations.


Muhammad Younis Shah, another resident of Muzaffarabad, recounted the damage in his neighborhood: “It’s terrifying. People are fleeing, terrified of what may come next. The fear is overwhelming.”


As rescue operations continue and both governments trade accusations, the international community has called for restraint. Analysts warn that further escalation could destabilize an already volatile region, with civilians on both sides caught in the crossfire.


The situation remains tense as the world watches to see whether diplomacy or confrontation will shape the next chapter in the long-standing conflict over Kashmir.

Hadisur Rahman, JadeTimes Staff   

H. Rahman is a Jadetimes news reporter covering the USA

Image Source: Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters
Image Source: Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters

A growing number of major U.S. law firms are scaling back their pro bono work in politically sensitive cases, as the Trump administration enforces executive orders restricting firms involved in litigation against the government.


Several legal aid organizations and firm insiders report that pro bono partnerships are increasingly difficult to secure for cases involving immigration, LGBTQ rights, and voting access. The chilling effect follows a series of executive actions by President Donald Trump that have barred select firms from federal buildings and pressured their clients through the withdrawal of government contracts.


"Firms are really gun shy to take on cases that may upset the administration," a senior partner at a large law firm told CNN on condition of anonymity.


The shift is notable in light of Big Law’s historical involvement in high-profile civil rights cases. Following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, hundreds of corporate lawyers helped file asylum petitions. In the wake of the Guantanamo Bay detainee list release in 2004, large firms mobilized to offer representation. Similarly, transgender individuals have frequently relied on large firm pro bono support for legal name changes.


The current political climate, however, has cast a shadow over such efforts. The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), a long-standing pro bono client of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, was briefly dropped by the firm after it became a target of the Trump administration. The decision came shortly before the firm reached a settlement with the White House to avoid further sanctions.


Though Paul Weiss later reinstated its representation of LULAC, the incident is viewed as a bellwether. Several other firms, including Skadden Arps, have reportedly entered into similar agreements, pledging tens of millions in pro bono services tied to government-approved causes such as anti-antisemitism initiatives and veterans' affairs areas already well-supported in legal circles.


Critics argue the settlements represent a retreat from advocacy in politically contentious areas. “They now have a new partner in vetting every pro bono decision they make: Donald Trump,” said James Sandman, a former president of the Legal Services Corporation and a long-time pro bono advocate.


Meanwhile, law firms like Perkins Coie and Jenner & Block continue to appear in court filings opposing administration policies, but observers note their numbers have diminished.


The legal community is awaiting further guidance following a recent executive order directing the Attorney General to develop a strategy for enlisting private-sector legal support for law enforcement officers facing civil suits.


While the long-term impact on public interest litigation remains uncertain, many fear a fundamental shift in the role of Big Law in defending civil liberties during politically fraught times.



Hadisur Rahman, JadeTimes Staff

H. Rahman is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Business

Image Source: REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File photo
Image Source: REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File photo

Wall Street’s major indexes fell on Tuesday as investor sentiment was rattled by fresh tariff concerns from U.S. President Donald Trump and ahead of a closely watched interest rate decision by the Federal Reserve.


Trump announced late Monday that new pharmaceutical tariffs would be introduced within two weeks, escalating trade tensions that have kept global markets on edge in recent months. The prospect of additional levies sent shares of major drugmakers tumbling, with Eli Lilly and Merck both dropping over 3%, and Pfizer declining 1.7%.


Despite an early selloff, markets pared some losses after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that some trade agreements could be announced later this week. “The market is going to seesaw depending on tariff discussions,” said Mark Hackett, chief market strategist at Nationwide. “Until we get some news of actual deals being signed, we’re going to be susceptible to these fluctuations.”


The Federal Reserve commenced its two-day policy meeting Tuesday. While no rate change is expected, market participants are eager for any signals on future monetary policy, particularly amid slowing growth and persistent trade-related volatility. Traders are currently pricing in a 25-basis-point cut in July, according to data from LSEG.


At 11:42 a.m. ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 168.75 points (0.40%) at 41,053.76. The S&P 500 declined 20.39 points (0.36%) to 5,629.99, while the Nasdaq Composite fell 90.30 points (0.51%) to 17,753.95. Most S&P 500 sectors were in negative territory, with healthcare the worst performer, sliding 1.7%.


One of the day’s few bright spots was Constellation Energy, which surged 9.8% following strong quarterly results, helping lift the utilities sector by 1.5%.


On the downside, Palantir Technologies saw its shares plummet 12.5% after posting a modest revenue beat and in-line profit that failed to impress investors. Similarly, DoorDash fell 7.2% following the announcement of its acquisition of British rival Deliveroo in a deal worth approximately £2.9 billion ($3.86 billion), alongside a quarterly revenue miss.


Ford Motor reversed earlier losses and rose about 4% in volatile trading after suspending its annual outlook. Despite the uncertainty, analysts noted that Trump’s recent positive remarks on the auto industry offered a boost to sentiment around the stock.


Meanwhile, the U.S. trade deficit hit a record high of $140.5 billion in March, as businesses rushed to import goods amid growing trade uncertainty.


Declining stocks outnumbered advancers by a 1.12-to-1 ratio on the NYSE and 1.62-to-1 on the Nasdaq. The S&P 500 recorded seven new 52-week highs and six new lows, while the Nasdaq logged 17 new highs and 75 new lows.



bottom of page