top of page

Dr. Sumit Kumar Pandey, Jadetimes Contributor

Assistant Professor, Department of Media, Communication and Fine Arts, Manipal University Jaipur

Mojtaba Khamenei, named Iran's Supreme Leader in March 2026, has not appeared publicly since. THAIRATH ONLINE
Mojtaba Khamenei, named Iran's Supreme Leader in March 2026, has not appeared publicly since. THAIRATH ONLINE

"Nobody has heard his voice in months. How can a country carry on when its own leader has gone silent?"

Jaipur, July 10, Since Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei was installed as Iran's Supreme Leader in early March, a week after his father, Ali Khamenei, was killed in US and Israeli strikes, he has not been seen, heard, or read from. No photograph, no recorded address, no written statement. For a country navigating war, sanctions and a still-fresh memory of suppressed unrest, its most powerful office has become an unanswered question.

A recurring concern even among those serving the Islamic Republic – in an informal series of interviews during the past few weeks – is that a faceless government is inviting just what the regime is constructed to avoid: chaos right at the moment when Tehran is being confronted by Washington. Reza, a 44-year-old central Tehran shopkeeper, was among those who spoke to the IPS casually over the last month who said "we have to know somebody is navigating the ship. It's better to have an injured captain than an empty wheelhouse.


The unease is a function of the unusual nature of the office itself. The Supreme Leader is not just a head of state, but a “deputy” of a messianic imam who is said to have disappeared in occultation in the 9th century, and who relies on an “authority that is seen as felt” in addition to having formal power under Iran's constitutional doctrine of velayat-e faqih. It was established in 1979 by Ruhollah Khomeini, who was retained through his own revolutionary charisma. Whereas Ali Khamenei, who was far from Khomeini's stature at the beginning, has been patiently developing his powers with the Revolutionary Guards throughout nearly four decades. Whereas Khomeini's founding legend and decades of accumulated leverage are absent, Mojtaba reportedly enjoys close ties with the Guards.

Members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), whose backing is central to Mojtaba Khamenei's authority. Source: BBC
Members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), whose backing is central to Mojtaba Khamenei's authority. Source: BBC

"He doesn't need to give a speech," one former mid-ranking official, who requested anonymity to discuss internal politics, offered by way of illustration. "He needs to be photographed. Just once. Power in this system has always required a face, not just a signature."


That absence of a face was starkest at Ali Khamenei's own funeral. The gold-domed shrine of the Imam Reza, Shi'ite Islam's holiest site in Mashhad, Iran, was the venue for the funeral prayers, but the new Supreme Leader was not the one to lead these prayers, rather it was his three brothers, all senior clerics, none of whom were recognized as political powerhouses. A grandson of Khomeini, on Mojtaba's behalf, spoke at a separate ceremony for the mourning, a move interpreted by a number of observers as an effort to gain the legitimacy of the founder through another mouth, as the incumbent was unable to lend his own.

Mourners gather at the Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad for Ali Khamenei's funeral ceremony, July 2026. Source: TheSundayGuardian
Mourners gather at the Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad for Ali Khamenei's funeral ceremony, July 2026. Source: TheSundayGuardian

Many had hoped that this would be the time when Mojtaba finally emerged, if not in person, then in a video statement or a new photo showing that he is alive and working. None of that ever came to pass. Iran is testing its leader of whom the public never saw lead for the toughest test in years, with the fighting with the United States again displayed this month, the economy still under sanctions and the memory of the violently suppressed protests of January still fresh.

Nivedita Chkrapani, Jadetimes Staff

Ai generated
Ai generated

Europe remains in the grip of an unprecedented heatwave today, with temperatures exceeding 40°C across several countries and health officials warning that the death toll is continuing to climb. The World Health Organization estimates that more than 1,300 excess deaths have already been linked to the extreme temperatures, making this one of the deadliest heatwaves in recent European history.


The intense heat has spread from Western Europe into Central and Eastern Europe, affecting countries including Spain, France, Italy, Germany, Croatia, Serbia, Hungary, and Ukraine. Hungary recorded a historic temperature of 42°C, while wildfires continue burning across parts of the Balkans. Emergency crews are battling multiple blazes as dry vegetation and strong winds fuel the fires.


Hospitals have reported a surge in patients suffering from heatstroke, dehydration, and respiratory illnesses. Authorities have opened emergency cooling centers, distributed drinking water, and advised residents to avoid outdoor activities during the hottest hours of the day.


The extreme temperatures have also disrupted transportation. Railway tracks have expanded under the heat, roads have deteriorated, and electricity grids are under heavy pressure as millions rely on air conditioning. Farmers warn that crops are suffering from drought, raising concerns about food production later this year.


Climate scientists say Europe is warming faster than the global average and warn that extreme heat events are becoming more frequent because of climate change. They emphasize that governments must invest in resilient infrastructure, urban cooling measures, and emergency preparedness.


Meteorologists expect temperatures to remain dangerously high for several more days, meaning the humanitarian and economic impacts are likely to worsen before conditions begin improving.

Adv Mehul Bansal, Jadetimes Staff

AI GENERATED
AI GENERATED

A marketing coordinator pastes a client's campaign brief into ChatGPT to speed up a first draft. A paralegal uploads a contract to an AI tool to summarize it. A sales rep runs a call through an AI transcription app nobody in IT has ever heard of. None of this feels like a legal problem in the moment. It is one.


What "Shadow AI" Actually Means


Shadow AI is the AI-era version of an older problem: shadow IT, where employees quietly adopt software their company never approved. What makes shadow AI different, and more serious, is that these tools don't just store the data employees feed them; many process, retain, and sometimes use it to improve their own models. Recent industry surveys put regular unsanctioned AI use among employees at somewhere between roughly 45% and two-thirds of the workforce, depending on how the question is asked, while formal AI security policies remain the exception rather than the rule at most organizations. One analysis put the average large company's real AI footprint at more than a dozen distinct tools in active use, most of which its own IT department doesn't know exist.

IMAGE SOURCE: ALAMY.COM
IMAGE SOURCE: ALAMY.COM

Why This Is a Legal Problem, Not Just an IT One


When an employee pastes customer records, health information, or financial data into an AI tool the company hasn't vetted, several legal issues can be triggered at once:


  • No data processing agreement. Regulations like GDPR and HIPAA require specific contractual protections before personal or health data is shared with a third party. An unapproved AI tool almost never has one in place, which can make the disclosure itself a violation, independent of anything that happens afterward.

  • Breach notification obligations. Most states require notifying affected individuals when their personal information is acquired by an unauthorized party. Depending on how an AI vendor handles submitted data, feeding it sensitive information could meet that legal definition, triggering notification duties the company didn't know it had.

  • No audit trail. Without a record of what was shared or with which tool, a company can struggle to answer a regulator's basic questions after an incident, let alone demonstrate it exercised reasonable care.

  • Liability for the output, not just the input. If an unauthorized tool helps make a hiring, lending, or customer-facing decision, the company can be held responsible for a biased or inaccurate outcome even though leadership never approved the tool that produced it.

  • Recording and consent laws. Several states require every participant's consent before a conversation is recorded or transcribed. An employee who quietly turns on an AI note-taker in a meeting can create liability under these laws, regardless of intent.


The Regulatory Net Is Tightening, but Unevenly


Regulators are actively racing to catch up, though not always in a straight line. The EU AI Act, for instance, was set to impose serious documentation and human-oversight obligations on "high-risk" AI use starting in August 2026 — but in a final vote in late June 2026, EU lawmakers agreed to push that deadline back to December 2027 for most high-risk systems, after months of negotiation over the rule's rollout. That's a useful reminder that this whole area is a moving target: a delay in one regulation doesn't touch HIPAA, GDPR, state privacy statutes, or the negligence and consumer-protection theories already being tested in court, all of which already apply to shadow AI use today, delay or no delay.


Building a Sane Governance Response


Banning AI outright rarely works. Employees who feel unsupported tend to simply go around the ban quietly, which makes visibility worse, not better. A more effective approach usually includes:


  1. Ask, don't accuse. A candid, non-punitive audit of what tools employees are actually using tells you far more than a policy memo ever will.

  2. Offer a sanctioned alternative that's just as good. Unsanctioned use tends to drop sharply once employees have an approved tool that matches the functionality they were seeking elsewhere.

  3. Classify tools by the data they'll touch. A tool used only on public marketing copy carries a very different risk profile than one touching health records or financial data — treat them accordingly.

  4. Put a policy in writing, with real consequences attached, and make sure a specific person owns keeping it current.

  5. Train, don't just publish a policy. Most shadow AI use comes from people trying to work faster, not from bad intent, so training that addresses the actual motivation works better than a rule nobody reads.


The Bottom Line


Shadow AI isn't a hypothetical risk that governance teams can plan for later. It's already happening inside most organizations right now, and the legal exposure it creates, under privacy law, discrimination law, and ordinary negligence principles, doesn't wait for a company's AI policy to catch up.

bottom of page