Nationwide Unrest Over Immigration Sparks Political Divide Amid Federal Crackdown
- Rahaman Hadisur
- Jun 13
- 2 min read
Hadisur Rahman, JadeTimes Staff
H. Rahman is a Jadetimes news reporter covering the USA

Days of violent protests across Los Angeles and other major U.S. cities have reignited a fierce political debate over immigration enforcement, public safety, and presidential authority.
Images and footage of burning vehicles, masked demonstrators waving Mexican flags, and widespread looting have circulated widely on social media, prompting a strong federal response and intensified partisan rhetoric. The unrest comes in the wake of renewed immigration enforcement actions by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), part of President Donald Trump’s broader crackdown on undocumented immigration.
In response to the violence, President Trump has deployed the National Guard and, more recently, Marine units to California to restore order a move that has drawn sharp criticism from Democratic leaders in the state.
California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have expressed concern over what they described as federal overreach, maintaining that their communities were managing largely peaceful demonstrations. However, critics argue that local officials have failed to maintain control amid mounting chaos.
Political Fallout and Division
Supporters of the administration argue that the scenes of destruction validate Trump’s tough-on-immigration policies. “Voters elected Trump to restore law and order and secure our borders,” said one political observer. “This crisis is exactly what many feared would continue under a Biden administration.”
Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, a Democrat, broke ranks with many in his party by publicly condemning the violence. Sharing an image of a protester standing atop a burning car draped in a Mexican flag, Fetterman wrote: “I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration − but this is not that. This is anarchy and true chaos.”
Fetterman added, “My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement.”
Differing Perspectives Among Democrats
Other Democratic figures, including Senators Cory Booker and Alex Padilla, and former Vice President Kamala Harris, have characterized the protests as “overwhelmingly peaceful,” blaming Trump’s aggressive ICE raids and rhetoric for escalating tensions.
“Trump’s goal is not to keep Californians safe,” former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton posted on X. “His goal is to cause chaos, because chaos benefits him politically.”
Media voices have also weighed in. CNN analyst Brian Stelter shared a quote describing the protests as “a cry of hope” and a manifestation of community longing, further polarizing public opinion.
Public Sentiment and the 2024 Aftermath
The events have rekindled memories of previous national protests and reignited concerns over political double standards. Many conservative commentators have pointed to what they perceive as Democratic inconsistency in addressing political violence, contrasting the current unrest with the Capitol riot of January 6, 2021.
For many Americans, particularly Trump’s base, the images coming out of California reaffirm their belief in the need for strict immigration enforcement and a strong federal hand.
As the unrest continues and federal forces work to restore order, the political divide over immigration, law enforcement, and national unity remains as stark as ever.
Comments